Author: info@amberhawk.com

Labour will keep the ID Card scheme.

It’s Wednesday, so how about an exercise in reading the political runes? Given the recent pronouncements by leading Government politicians, what do you think is going to happen to the ID Card scheme and its related database, the National Identity Register (NIR)? Is the ID Card scheme on the back burner (Lord Mandleson) or is it a necessary frontline service that needs protecting from the cuts (Mr Brown)? Clearly, the NIR is not dead because the ID Card Scheme Commissioner

Read article

Information Commissioner wrong to blame Parliament and the Courts

Ten days ago, the new Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham, was given a difficult time by MPs of the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee. The reason: he admitted to the Committee investigating “Press Standards, Privacy and Libel” that he did not have the resources to enforce the Act against the three hundred or so journalists who had used private investigators to obtain personal data unlawfully. He also said that Parliament and the Courts had let him down in

Read article

Vetted volunteers to “volunteer” fingerprints and obtain a “voluntary” ID Card?

The brouhaha surrounding the vetting undertaken by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) with respect to the safeguarding the vulnerable has tended to overlook that such volunteers are likely to “volunteer” to obtain their ID Card. In addition, the link to ID Cards may increase the cost of “volunteering” to about £170 (the vetting fee of £64 and the ID Card cost of £100 plus). Although such a prospect has not been discussed by the press or by Ministers, in my

Read article

The data protection arguments surrounding the DNA database are clarified

In July this year, the Times reported a Whitehall briefing paper that discussed the use of portable equipment that provided the police with a DNA analysis within one hour, rather than the three days it currently takes. In ten years time, it easy to envisage that DNA checking will occur in real-time,  raising the spectre of instant DNA checks for those stopped in connection with road traffic offences or with street incidents. If we are really lucky, such DNA checks

Read article

Is there is no chance of winning a privacy complaint?

For the last 20 years, Home Secretaries have been signing warrants that allow for the access to the content of intercepted communications and as well as powers of entry, search and seizure for the national security agencies. Not many people object to these powers because the interception, search or entry is in a good cause that protects the public. But how do we know this? The answer is that the Government has established a number of independent regulators (e.g. Surveillance

Read article

Is “one adult in 78” subject to surveillance of their communications?

Whilst on holiday abroad (late August), I spotted a Daily Mail headline that baldly stated that “one in 78 adults came under state-sanctioned surveillance last year”. Perusing the newspaper at a safe distance of 1.625 metres, it did not take me long to work out that the story had missed some other interesting statistical points in relation to the Annual Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner, just published. Any informed analysis of this controversial subject must start with the

Read article

Information Commissioner’s staff are mystery shoppers

Isn’t coming back to work after a two week holiday a drag? One of the things I should have blogged about before the summer break was the discussion at launch of the Information Commissioner’s Annual Report about “mystery FOI shoppers”.  You should realise that ICO staff are already mystery FOI shoppers but in my view, it is only a matter of time before such activity extends to data protection. The Commissioner stated at the Annual Report launch that in the

Read article

Shelagh Gaskill bursary launched to help Charities, Voluntary Groups and Housing Associations with cost of Data Protection compliance

Amberhawk Training today announces the creation of the Shelagh Gaskill Bursary, which provides up to £1,000 towards the cost of legal training in freedom of information and data protection.  The bursary is a progression of the Shelagh Gaskill Scholarship that was successfully administered by international law firm Pinsent Masons following Shelagh’s death in 2006.  The scholarship operated for three years and provided training in data protection and freedom of information for charities and those in the voluntary sector.  It supported

Read article

The Hawk soars off for a well earned break.

It’s been an incredibly busy year in the life if Amberhawk Training Limited, so the Hawk has decided to flap its wings and soar away for a few weeks of rest and recuperation in the woods. We’ll be flying back in 3-4 weeks to continue with our fantastic training courses covering Data Protection, Freedom of Information and the ISEB qualification, held at venues in Leeds, London and Manchester or on site at a location of your choice.   You’ll still

Read article

The Freedom of Information equivalent of “not tonight Josephine?”

In October 2007, in a speech on liberty at the University of Westminster, the Prime Minister announced that more “Freedom of Information is the right course because government belongs to the people, not the politicians” adding that “there is more we can do to change the culture and the workings of government to make it more open”. He continued: “Public information does not belong to Government; it belongs to the public on whose behalf government is conducted. Wherever possible that

Read article
Search Hawktalk blogs by month :
Select Date
View blogs by category:
Hawktalk Taxonomy