Category: Data Protection

Many Data Protection Bill exemptions are expanded, unexplained and some permit unlawful processing

The political kerfuffle over the Government’s Brexit machinations makes it timely to point out that the European Commission’s negotiating document on Brexit states that the UK’s implementation of the GDPR is an issue of importance in any negotiations. Indeed, the Commission’s document states that the content of the UK’s Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”), now before the House of Commons, is unfinished business from the first phase of these negotiations. I had mistakenly assumed that stage one of these Brexit talks

Read article

New Year resolution: “I will collect details of transfers from the European Union into the UK and vice-versa”

Mrs May, at the last Prime Minister’s Questions before the Xmas recess, said in response to a question from a Conservative MP: “We are very clear that we (the UK) will be leaving the EU on 29 March 2019 at 11 pm”. As Government policy is for the UK to become a Third Country on this date, what does this imply? First, any assessment of UK adequacy by the European Commission (if one is to be made) has to be undertaken before

Read article

Under the GDPR, does processing personal data “in the public interest” permit “function creep”?

What finer way to send blog readers on their happy way to the end of year’s festivities but to pose two questions for post-Xmas dinner debate. The first question is: “Does ‘processing personal data in the public interest’ include that ‘processing in the interest of the Government of the day’?”. The reason for asking this question is that the GDPR is stuffed with Articles and Recitals that refer to “the public interest”, “important reasons of public interest” or “substantial public

Read article

A Framework to undermine the ICO’s ability to enforce the new Data Protection Bill across the public sector

The Government has just inserted clauses into the DPBill that allows the Secretary of State to issue a “Framework for Data Processing”, initially for each Government Department.  This Framework has the status of statutory guidance and “will set out the manner in which government should process (personal) data”. In effect the Framework is like a statutory Code of Practice; its aim is to “improve the transparency and clarity of existing government data processing”. The Framework, according to the official explanation,

Read article

Health and Social Work public bodies do not need to rely on data subject consent for the processing of personal data

The Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”) based on the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) will, hopefully, call time on what always has been a problem. Controllers who believe that the delivery of health, education and social work public sector services have to rely on “data subject consent” for the processing of personal data related to those services. When the DPBill is enacted, any reliance on consent creates a problem because when a data subject withdraws consent, there is an expectation that

Read article

DPBill provides flexible grounds for public bodies when processing personal data for their statutory functions

Under the current Data Protection Act (“DPA”), controllers need a Schedule 2 legal basis/ground to process personal data. Schedule 2 lists six main groupings and a controller has to select at least one from the list. If a controller does not have a legal basis/ground for the processing, then the controller cannot process the personal data – end of argument. So, it is surprising to discover that Clause 8 of the Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”), through the use of the word “includes”, can

Read article

DP Bill’s new immigration exemption can put EU citizens seeking a right to remain at considerable disadvantage

The Government has added a completely new immigration control exemption to the Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”). This exemption does not appear in the Data Protection Act 1984 nor in the Data Protection Act 1998 so the question immediately arises as to “why an immigration exemption is now suddenly needed?”. The exemption is very broad; it is from all data subject’s rights (e.g. of access, information about the processing) if satisfying these rights would prejudice “the maintenance of effective immigration control” or “the

Read article

Is the definition of “personal data” in new DP Bill correct?

Have you ever come to a conclusion that worries you and you can’t find the error? Well since it’s Friday tomorrow I will ask a Friday question today; the question is: ‘Is the definition of “personal data” in the new Bill fit for purpose?’. In summary, I think there is a problem with “personal data” definition in the Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”) as there is no equivalent of Section 1(2) of the Data Protection Act (“DPA”). This Section extends the definition

Read article

Definitions in new DP Bill weaken protection for data subjects

Like many people, I am ploughing through the new Data Protection Bill (“DPBill”) Bill; when I have enough for a blog, I will write one. In this blog, I show that some definitions used in the Bill could have significant negative consequences for data subjects. For instance:  the removal of “Representative” means that the DPBill cannot be enforced against, for example, USA data controllers not established in the UK. the treatment of “Accessible Record” and “unstructured manual files” in the

Read article

Draconian powers in EU Withdrawal Bill can negate new Data Protection law

Unless the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill is modified, the new Data Protection Bill that implements the UK’s version of the GDPR (expected tomorrow) can be modified or even repealed using Ministerial powers that are not subject to detailed scrutiny.  Indeed, I will go so far to say that the European Commission would be advised not to grant the UK the status of offering an adequate level of protection until further legislative guarantees are enacted by the UK. So bad is

Read article
Search Hawktalk blogs by month :
Select Date
View blogs by category:
Hawktalk Taxonomy