Category: News

Internal investigation into a Monetary Penalty Notice has to be released under FOIA

Public authorities should be prepared that, if they are subject to enforcement action by the Information Commissioner  (e.g. Monetary Penalty Notice, Undertaking, Audit, Enforcement Notice etc), that internal reports into why the action was taken might become the target for FOI requests. This is the outcome of a recent Decision Notice involving the London Borough of Ealing. Implicitly, the ICO is signalling that he thinks such reports and investigations should be published where practicable. In February 2011, Ealing Council reported a

Read article

Enforced Subject Access to medical data raises its ugly head in the insurance industry

There is a dispute between the British Medical Association and the insurance industry over payments for GP medical reports concerning the health of claimants and the underwriting of insurance. The result is that some insurance providers (e.g. Legal and General) are resorting to a variant of enforced subject access. This trend is likely to continue, especially if Government plans to provide patients with on-line access to their own health records come to fruition. I can see many organisations being tempted to

Read article

MoJ asks for arguments to oppose the European Commission’s Data Protection Regulation

Quick blog as I am teaching most of the week; but the headline says it all. A colleague of mine went to a lecture on the proposed Data Protection Regulation two days ago (organised by Field Fisher Waterhouse -  the city law firm that employs data protection stalwart Stewart Room and which hosts meetings of the National Association of Data Protection Officers – a information law grouping which has expanded its interest to cover FOI and RIPA issues as well).

Read article

Could the Information Commissioner have stopped the use of ex-directory numbers by the press?

You have probably skimmed section 32 of the Data Protection Act, and seen that the exemption negates the application of all the Principles (except the 7th) and most of the data subject rights, if personal data are processed for a journalism purpose and if the processing is necessary with a “view to publication” of the personal data. You also probably have drawn the conclusion that there was not much data protection to be had, given the scope of this exemption

Read article

EU Data Protection Regulation breaks explicit link with “privacy” and Human Rights.

The Data Protection Regulation intended to replace Directive 95/46/EC has broken the very explicit link to Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. It has also replaced the “right to privacy” with “the right to the protection of personal data” (which I will shorten to the "right to data protection"). Article 1 of Directive 95/46/EC to be replaced, defines its purpose in these words: “In accordance with this Directive, Member States shall protect the fundamental rights and freedoms

Read article

The Regulation: what are the big changes to the Data Protection Act regime?

I thought I would devote a blog to answer the following question: “What would I say, if a manager asked me what were the key changes to the data protection regime as a result of the Regulation?”. So please use/amend the text for this purpose if need be. Note the blog is only about the Regulation:– not the law enforcement elements where there is a separate Directive also published today. The first point to make is that a Regulation has

Read article

USA offers an adequate level of protection: EU accepts disproportionate processing, excessive retention, a lack of respect for privacy and minimal accountability.

The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (WP) has just published its comments on the EU-USA Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreement; a deal that I analysed just before Xmas as having the following characteristics: “data protection is weak, proportionality not guaranteed, and obvious safeguards absent” (see references). This view is substantiated by the WP’s comments. As a general assessment, the WP notes that there have been “modest” improvements from earlier drafts “but does not see its serious concerns removed”.  Primarily

Read article

Watch out for the Data Protection Regulation at end of January

A brief note: between January 25th (most likely) and January 28th the official draft of a Regulation is expected to be published; it eventually result in changes to the UK's Data Protection Act. I will do an analysis of it for the blog in the following weeks. Also, our UPDATE session on March 26th in London will be revised in order to have at least a half day devoted to the Regulation and what it means for data controllers. Our guest

Read article

Judgement reinforces the link between “lawful processing”, the First Data Protection Principle and human rights/other laws.

Belated Happy New Year, but we start 2012 with a report that has a lot in it. Stick with this judgement as, in summary, it states that: (a) the term “lawful” processing in First Principle relates to that processing which is consistent with the application of any relevant law including law of confidence (the Information Commissioner is not keen to enforce “lawful processing”); I should add that the implications of “lawful processing” have yet to be applied to other Principles (e.g. to the

Read article

The Data Protection Officer’s ABC

There is a folk tradition which involves ABC songs; the “Sailor’s ABC” and the “Socialist’s ABC” are perhaps the most notable. So to sing at parties or around the holiday log-fires, I offer an addition to the genre. It is called "The Data Protection Officer's ABC".    When that I was a tiny, tiny boy, my daddy said to me; "The time has come, me bonny, bonny bairn, to learn your ABC." Now my daddy was a privacy man and had

Read article
Search Hawktalk blogs by month :
Select Date
View blogs by category:
Hawktalk Taxonomy